Press

Company Backgrounder

AIQA Global, LLC — Comprehensive Reference for Media, Investors, and Partners

Methodology

The AIQ™ Score

The AIQ score is a standardized, evidence-based rating of enterprise AI governance quality. It encompasses 250 governance factors across the full spectrum of enterprise AI risk: model development and validation, data governance, human oversight, bias and fairness, cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, and organizational accountability.

The rating methodology produces a score on a 0–200 scale that functions like a credit rating for AI governance. It is independent, repeatable, and built on verifiable evidence rather than self-attestation. That distinction—self-attestation is not governance—is the core principle that runs through everything AIQA does.

The scoring methodology draws on recognized governmental and non-governmental AI standards, including the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, and other established frameworks. A provisional patent application covering the AIQ score methodology has been filed.

Why Existing Frameworks Are Not Substitutes

A framework is not a rating.

Frameworks like the NIST AI RMF tell an organization what good governance looks like. A rating measures how well an organization is actually practicing it, on a standardized scale, at a specific point in time.

Self-assessment is not independent scoring.

The Big Four advisory frameworks and most AI assurance services rely on the organization’s own representations; there is no independent, evidence-based score that external parties—insurers, investors, regulators—can rely on as a standardized market signal.

Compliance checklists are not market signals.

ISO certification confirms that a management system meets requirements; it does not produce a granular, comparative quality score that tells an insurer whether Company A governs AI materially better than Company B.

AIQA exists in the gap between frameworks and market-grade measurement—the independent, standardized rating that converts governance practice into a comparable, investable, insurable signal.

Market

Market Opportunity & Regulatory Urgency

Companies are investing in artificial intelligence at an unprecedented pace, yet almost no one is measuring whether that AI is being used responsibly, safely, or effectively. According to a January 2025 McKinsey survey, only one percent of organizational leaders describe their companies as AI-mature, even as the overwhelming majority plan to increase AI investment.

Regulatory Timeline

June 30, 2026

Colorado AI Act

Requires developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to use reasonable care to protect consumers from known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination.

August 2, 2026

EU AI Act — Deployer Obligations

High-risk AI system deployer obligations take effect, requiring conformity assessments, documentation, and risk management.

Through Sept 2026

NAIC 12-State AI Pilot

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners is running a 12-state AI Evaluation Tool pilot.

Proposed

GSA AI Procurement Clause

GSAR 552.239-7001 would give the federal government authority to independently evaluate contractor AI systems.

Insurance as a Forcing Mechanism

Insurance carriers are beginning to scrutinize AI governance in underwriting decisions, and new policy exclusions addressing generative AI risk are emerging—a pattern that mirrors the early trajectory of SOC 2 and PCI adoption. As underwriting practices evolve, companies that lack measurable AI governance evidence may face higher premiums, coverage restrictions, or reduced availability.

The Cost of Ungoverned AI

97%

of AI-related security breaches involved systems lacking proper access controls

IBM 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report

400+ days

average time for an enterprise to discover unauthorized AI tools in its systems

Industry study

$4.88M

global average cost of a data breach

IBM 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report

$2.2M

average cost reduction for organizations that extensively deployed AI and automation in prevention workflows

IBM 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report

Segments

Applicable Market Segments

AIQA has developed dedicated reference materials for seven distinct market segments. The AIQ score itself is consistent across all segments—same methodology, same scale, same independence.

Enterprise Leadership & Boards

How do we govern AI across our organization?

Insurance Companies

How do we underwrite AI governance risk?

Investors (PE & VC)

How does AI governance affect my returns?

Law Firms

How does this generate revenue for my practice?

Audit & Assurance Firms

How do we deliver this as a scalable service?

Technology & AI Platforms

How does this help me close deals faster?

Government & Municipal

How do we govern AI accountably for citizens?

The seven segments form a connected system: enterprise adoption creates demand, insurance creates enforcement, investors reinforce through valuation, audit and law firms scale delivery, technology providers embed governance into infrastructure, and government adoption legitimizes the standard.

Origin Story

In the summer of 2025, Jim Malackowski and his son Chase shared a common belief that Artificial Intelligence was going to be the defining technology of their lifetime and they were determined to immerse themselves in the potential opportunity and understand the risks. Drawing on a favorite movie of Jim’s, Back to School, the pair decided to enroll together seeking the first ever master’s degree in AI Management offered by Georgetown University.

Midway through their first semester the pair realized that enterprises are adopting AI at extraordinary speed, but no one is measuring whether they are governing it well. The opportunity to address the problem was not hypothetical. Regulatory mandates were emerging globally—the EU AI Act, U.S. federal procurement rules, SEC disclosure expectations, state-level legislation—and yet no standardized, independent, evidence-based rating system existed for enterprise AI governance quality.

Jim recognized this gap as a category-creation opportunity—directly analogous to one he had seen before. AIQA Global was formed in November 2025. The company is headquartered in Chicago with offices in North Miami Beach and Greenwich. Joel E. Lutzker, the third co-founder, serves as Chief IP Officer and manages prosecution of AIQA’s pending patent applications.

The Ocean Tomo Precedent

AIQA’s methodology follows the playbook James Malackowski used at Ocean Tomo, LLC, where he served as Chairman and CEO. At Ocean Tomo, he launched the Ocean Tomo Ratings™ system, which evaluated U.S. patents using a set of objective renewal and citation metrics drawn from publicly available patent office data. Patents that get renewed, cited by other inventors, and maintained over long periods tend to be more valuable than patents abandoned early. Ocean Tomo took those signals and turned them into quality scores.

Ocean Tomo then used those scores to construct the Ocean Tomo 300® Patent Index (NYSE: OTPAT), a rules-based stock market index selecting 300 companies based on patent portfolio strength. The index outperformed the S&P 500 by more than 1,600 basis points over nearly a decade—proving that intangible asset quality, when properly measured, is a reliable predictor of business performance.

The AIQ score applies the same principle. Where Ocean Tomo evaluated patents using renewal metrics from the USPTO, the AIQ score evaluates company AI governance using metrics drawn from governmental and non-governmental AI standards. And just as Ocean Tomo turned patent scores into an investable stock market index, AIQA is developing the AIQ 100™ Governance Index—a rules-based public equity index selecting 100 stocks based on AI governance quality and AI adoption opportunity.

Team

Leadership

James E. Malackowski

James E. Malackowski

Chairman & Co-Founder

Jim currently serves as Chief Intellectual Property Officer of J.S. Held LLC, a 2,000-person global consulting firm. He brings four decades of leadership at the intersection of intellectual property, finance, and technology. At Ocean Tomo, LLC, where he served as Chairman and CEO, he launched the Ocean Tomo Ratings™ system and the Ocean Tomo 300® Patent Index (NYSE: OTPAT). A 2022 inductee to the IP Hall of Fame and the 2025 recipient of the LES Gold Medal—the highest honor in the global business of intellectual property—he is one of only seven individuals in history to hold both distinctions. He is a participant in the inaugural 2025 cohort of Georgetown University’s Master’s program in AI Management.

Chase J. Malackowski

Chase J. Malackowski

Co-Founder & Managing Director

Chase is the developer of the 250-factor AIQ™ score methodology. A graduate of the University of Southern California’s Iovine and Young Academy for Arts, Technology, and the Business of Innovation, he is completing graduate studies at Georgetown University in AI-driven decision-making and ethical AI as a member of the program’s inaugural cohort. He is also the founder of Career Capture, an AI-powered professional development platform.

Joel E. Lutzker

Joel E. Lutzker

Co-Founder & Chief IP Officer

A career patent attorney and former Ocean Tomo General Counsel, Joel manages firm legal matters including prosecution of AIQA’s two pending patent applications—one covering the AIQ score methodology and one covering the AI governance-based public equity index construction.

AI-Native Operations

AIQA operates as one of the first AI-native professional services firms, with AI agents deployed in designated roles at every level of the organization. No AI-generated output—whether a client communication, a rating input, or a published data point—leaves AIQA without human review and approval. This non-negotiable human-in-the-loop principle is both an operational safeguard and a brand signal: a company that rates AI governance must itself practice rigorous AI governance.

Intellectual Property

AIQA has filed two provisional patent applications. The first covers the AIQ score methodology—the system and process by which enterprise AI governance quality is measured and rated. The second covers the construction of public equity indices based on AI governance ratings, underpinning the AIQ 100™ Governance Index. Both applications reflect AIQA’s intent to establish defensible barriers around the category it is creating.

Press Release
April 15, 2026

As AI Governance Demands Intensify, AIQA Global Launches First Independent Rating System

New AIQ™ Score Delivers First Standardized, Evidence-Based Rating of Enterprise AI Governance

AIQA Global, LLC, the first independent AI governance rating firm, today announced the launch of the AIQ™ score, the first independent, standardized rating of enterprise AI governance quality. The rating assesses how well organizations manage, govern, and protect their use of artificial intelligence, giving investors, insurers, and corporate boards a comparable measure of AI readiness and risk across organizations.

AIQ

Media Contact

Chase J. Malackowski

Co-Founder & Managing Director

AIQA Global, LLC — Chicago  |  Miami  |  Greenwich

© 2026 AIQA Global, LLC. All rights reserved. AIQ™ and AIQ score™ are trademarks of AIQA Global, LLC.

AIQA Terminal