Media coverage and industry commentary on AIQA Global and the AIQ™ score — the first independent rating of enterprise AI governance quality.
Media Coverage
Editorial reporting and high-reach distribution covering AIQA Global and the AIQ™ score.
Morningstar · September 3, 2026
Morningstar carried the AIQ DNA announcement to its institutional investor readership, surfacing a framework that regroups AIQA's governance datapoints into Structural, Deter, Notify, and Act — capability organized by what a control does rather than by policy area.
Read full articleCrain's Chicago Business · August 24, 2026
Crain's Forum cover story on Illinois' new AI safety law turned to AIQA Global chairman and co-founder James Malackowski for the argument that regulation reaching only the largest frontier developers leaves everyday enterprises to govern their own AI use, and that an independent rating gives them a way to do it.
Read full articleGARP (Global Association of Risk Professionals) · July 17, 2026
GARP profiles the AIQ™ Score for the risk-management community, casting independent, quantitative AI governance rating as the missing signal for enterprise risk teams.
Read full articleBriefGlance · May 14, 2026
BriefGlance reported on a strategic partnership positioning the AIQ™ score at the convergence point of independent AI governance rating and enterprise cybersecurity, signaling that boards now treat AI oversight and cyber risk as a single accountability surface.
Read full articlecitybiz · May 7, 2026
Business news outlet citybiz framed the Ross appointment around AIQA’s insurance-sector growth strategy, distinguishing the move as a deliberate market-segment build rather than routine personnel news.
Read full articleThe AI Journal · April 30, 2026
AI-focused trade outlet The AI Journal covered Vedder’s adoption of the AIQ™ score as a milestone in the professional services sector’s move toward independently verified AI governance.
Read full articleMorningstar · April 30, 2026
Morningstar carried the Vedder engagement story, surfacing the first-law-firm adoption to its capital markets readership.
Read full articleHeyra · April 20, 2026
Heyra’s LinkedIn-native newsletter The Latest in Artificial Intelligence (issue 044) profiled the AIQ™ score launch alongside coverage of Anthropic and OpenAI, framing independent third-party rating as the inflection point in how enterprises will be judged on AI governance.
Read full articleHipther · April 16, 2026
Independent editorial roundup placed AIQA Global alongside Snap, Hightouch, Anthropic, and Cloudflare as evidence that AI is becoming a management discipline as much as a technical one, with a dedicated section devoted to AIQA’s case for independent third-party governance verification.
Read full articleYahoo Finance · April 16, 2026
Yahoo Finance carried the launch coverage to retail and institutional investor audiences, surfacing the parallel between AIQ™ score methodology and the Ocean Tomo rating-of-intangibles playbook.
Read full articleMorningstar · April 16, 2026
Morningstar’s news service distributed the launch coverage to its institutional investor and asset management readership.
Read full articleOp-Eds
Bylined opinion pieces authored by AIQA Global leadership in third-party outlets.
LESI Global IP Forum · September 3, 2026
Delivered at the LESI Global IP Forum hosted by the USPTO, AIQA chairman James Malackowski argues that what a country gains from AI turns less on how widely it adopts the technology than on whether it can own, finance, and retain what its economy helps create — and that AI governance expressed as observable, verifiable factors is part of the market infrastructure those gains depend on.
Read op-edCrain's Chicago Business · June 18, 2026
In Crain's Chicago Business, AIQA sets out the case that AI's deepening trust problem calls for what Chicago is building: independent, quantitative governance rating.
Read op-edPodcasts
Audio appearances by AIQA Global leadership — interviews, panels, and long-form conversations.
Chicago's Morning Answer with Dan Proft · June 15, 2026
AIQA joins Chicago's Morning Answer with Dan Proft to make the case for independent AI governance rating; the segment begins at 2:02.
AIQA segment starts at 2:02
ListenChicago's Morning Answer (YouTube) · June 10, 2026
In this clip from Chicago's Morning Answer, AIQA's James and Chase Malackowski lay out how independent, quantitative rating rebuilds trust in enterprise AI.
ListenThe Marc Cox Morning Show · June 5, 2026
On The Marc Cox Morning Show, AIQA discusses Illinois SB 315 — the first US law to require independent third-party audits of frontier AI developers — and what mandated external verification signals for the future of enterprise AI governance.
ListenTV & Video
Broadcast television appearances and long-form video interviews featuring AIQA Global leadership.
NewsNation · September 21, 2026 · 5 min
James E. Malackowski on NewsNation · AIQA Global
Watch on YouTubeOn NewsNation, AIQA makes the case for scoring how safely an organization deploys AI, arguing that the enterprises running the technology — not only the labs building it — are where governance is most controllable.
NewsNation · September 15, 2026 · 4 min
James E. Malackowski on NewsNation · AIQA Global
Watch on YouTubeOn NewsNation, AIQA argues that AI governance warrants the same independent review long required of financial statements, and that every organization deploying AI needs controls that deter, notify and act.
Fox 32 Chicago (WFLD) · June 20, 2026
On Fox 32 Chicago, AIQA breaks down Illinois' new law requiring independent third-party AI safety audits — the first of its kind in the US — and why outside verification is becoming the benchmark for trustworthy AI.
WatchIndustry Commentary
Analysis from independent commentators and industry observers referencing the AIQ™ score and AIQA Global’s approach.
Big John Howell (Substack) · July 1, 2026
Chicago broadcaster Big John Howell examines how the AIQ™ Score supplies the independent accountability layer enterprise AI has been missing.
Read commentaryOcean Tomo Insights · April 27, 2026
A board-level analysis of AI washing risk that frames quantitative AI governance scoring as the next stage of fiduciary oversight, citing the AIQ™ score as a representative methodology.
Read commentaryMedia inquiries: press@aiqaglobal.com
AIQ™ and AIQ™ Score are trademarks of AIQA Global, LLC. Headlines are reproduced solely for identification and attribution of third-party coverage; full articles are available at the publisher source links above. All rights in the original articles remain with their respective publishers. AIQ™ scores are based on disclosed and verified data and represent AIQA Global’s independent assessment of AI governance quality. Scores do not constitute regulatory compliance, legal advice, or investment advice.